How we work

Our work is based on recognized international standards, behavioral science, and design principles. This ensures quality and reproducibility.

The 5 Principles of Our Work

International Standards

We follow methodologies
that are recognized
in the EU, and the UN:
Design Thinking
Realist Evaluation
Theory of Change
MOST framework (UN)
Participatory Action Research


Each project has a clearly defined methodology agreed upon with our partners

Transparent
methods

All of our studies include:
Clear research questions
A defined audience
An open study protocol
Raw data storage (where possible)
A technical report on methodologica
l limitations

Goal: to enable other researchers to verify the results

Representativeness

The size of each sample is calculated statistically. The percentage of incomplete quota groups
is ≤ 10%.

For qualitative methods:

Theoretical saturation
Cross-coding
(2+ experts)
Validation with participants

Research
Ethics

Before each study:
Informed consent from participants
Risk assessment for vulnerable groups
Protection of confidentiality
Data de-identification in reports, when necessary


Within the team, we hold an ethics discussion for each project

Data
Openness

Where permitted we:-release raw data
- provide codebooks and tools
- publish methodological notes
- publish top-line tables

When information is private or sensitive we:
- publish aggregated results
- offer NDA access
- provide a contact for inquiries

Choosing a Method for Each Type of Study

Quantitative or qualitative? It depends on the type of question.

    • Question

    • Method

    • When to use

    • Question

    • Question

    • Method

    • Method

    • When to use

    • When to use

    • How many people ...?
      What percentage ...?

    • CATICAWI

    • A large sample size is needed,
      speed

    • Question

    • How many people ...?
      What percentage ...?

    • Method

    • CATICAWI

    • When to use

    • A large sample size is needed,
      speed

    • How do people do ...?
      What obstacles ...?

    • In-depth interviewsFocus Groups

    • Understand the process, see the details,
      test hypotheses

    • Question

    • How do people do ...?
      What obstacles ...?

    • Method

    • In-depth interviewsFocus Groups

    • When to use

    • Understand the process, see the details,
      test hypotheses

    • What kind of system is this...?
      How is everything connected?

    • System MappingStakeholder Analysis

    • Understand and identify
      points of influence

    • Question

    • What kind of system is this...?
      How is everything connected?

    • Method

    • System MappingStakeholder Analysis

    • When to use

    • Understand and identify
      points of influence

    • What has changed?
      What are the results?

    • Evaluation Research(quantitative + qualitative)

    • Measuring the Results
      of Programs or Policies

    • Question

    • What has changed?
      What are the results?

    • Method

    • Evaluation Research(quantitative + qualitative)

    • When to use

    • Measuring the Results
      of Programs or Policies

    • What's the best way to do this?

    • Co-design workshopsPrototyping

    • We develop together
      with our users

    • Question

    • What's the best way to do this?

    • Method

    • Co-design workshopsPrototyping

    • When to use

    • We develop together
      with our users

How Quality Control Is Conducted

Every project goes through several levels of quality control:

1

LEVEL 1: PLANNING

● A clear research question
● Literature review (what do we already know?)
● Choice of method (why this one in particular?)
● Research design (agreed upon with partners)
● Risk assessment (especially for vulnerable groups)

2

LEVEL 2: IMPLEMENTATION

● Training for researchers/interviewers
● Piloting (trial session with a % indicator)
● Data quality (checking incomplete questionnaires)
● Validation to date (for qualitative methods)

3

LEVEL 3: ANALYSIS

● Code book (all categories documented)
● Cross-coding
● Accurate statistics (for quantitative data)
● Analyst’s control sample

4

LEVEL 4: REPORT

● A clear distinction between results and conclusions
● Limitations of the method (acknowledging what might have gone wrong)
● Peer review (often: one external expert)
● Discussion with partners prior to publication

5

RESULT:

A report you can trust

The tools we use

We combine proven methods with our own innovations:

CATI / CAWI 

Alchemer (surveys)
LimeSurvey (surveys)
SPSS (analysis)
Tableau (dashboards)

Qualitative Methods

Structured interviews
Focus groups
Desk research
Ethnography (observation)
Rich Data Survey (multidimensional text coding)

Evaluation

Logic models
Theory of Change
Most Significant Change
Impact evaluation

Design

Figma (prototyping)
Miro (collaborative
whiteboards)
User journey mapping
Prototyping materials

Senso.ua

Our own national online panel for public opinion research